A Note to the Broader Precariat

The precariat I document in this project is shaped by my specific location. I offer this as one situated, theorized account, with the explicit hope that it invites other accounts, from other bodies, in other contexts.

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Many Bodies, Same Ground

On the limits of any one account, and the invitation that follows from those limits.


Weathered stone discs arranged in a group beneath a tree, resting on pine needles and dry earth in afternoon light.
Photo: Amy Tucker, © 2026

The precariat I document in this project is shaped by my specific location: white, settler, Canadian, English-speaking, working within a particular institutional culture at a particular historical moment. I know that. I want to say it plainly here, in a post of its own, because it matters to the meaning of everything else.

Fractured Ground

A dark crystalline rock fragment resting on a wooden surface, its fractured edges catching the light.
Photo: Amy Tucker, © 2026

Precarious academic labour looks different across national contexts, languages, genders, races, and institutional cultures. A contract instructor in Mexico navigates different structures, different protections or their absence, different relationships between labour, identity, and institutional belonging, than a contract instructor in Canada. A sessional lecturer in the United Kingdom faces different union landscapes, different visa conditions, and different histories of what the university is and who it serves. A contingent faculty member in the United States works within a different legal framework and a different geography of precarity than someone at a Brazilian federal university or a South African college under austerity. The structural conditions are related but far from identical, and collapsing them into a single story would harm each.

What Endures

A large weathered rock formation standing at the shore under an open sky, its surface layered and worn by time.
Photo: Amy Tucker, © 2026

What is shared across these contexts is real and significant: the insecurity, the chronic self-monitoring, the way worth becomes tied to the next contract, the exhaustion of performing enthusiasm for an institution that holds you at arm’s length, the particular loneliness of caring deeply about work that the system treats as interchangeable. These are patterns that cross borders. This project names them from one body, in one country, in one language.

Your account is the one this one cannot give. I hope you write it.

What is different across these contexts is equally real and equally significant. I offer this project as one situated, documented, and theorized account, grounded in the specificity of where I stood and what I carried. It is the beginning of an argument, and beginnings require continuation. The next study needs more voices, more bodies, more contexts, in other languages and other institutional landscapes, with methodologies capable of holding that breadth without flattening it.

If you are reading this and you recognize something here, I am glad the account reached you. If you are reading this and thinking, “but it was different for me, my country, my language, my body,” then I want you to know that difference is exactly what this project is calling for. Your account is the one that this one cannot give. I hope you write it.

Carried Here

A pale flat stone with golden and cream tones resting in dark sand, smooth-edged and quietly present.
Photo: Amy Tucker, © 2026

Still Standing

A stone cairn balanced carefully in the night outside a lit building, stones stacked in quiet equilibrium.
Photo: Amy Tucker, © 2026

The stones hold each other. That is enough to begin.


Still: A Door at King’s College and the Geography of Academic Precarity

Reading Time: 6 minutes

I stood in the corridor of the Foundation Year Program at the University of King’s College in Halifax and read a door. Two posters were taped to its panels, framing the nameplate of Dr. Maria Euchner, Senior Fellow in the Humanities and Associate Director, FYP (Academic). The poster on the left read, in heavy black type: “First-Year Fellows Don’t Make a Living Wage.” The poster on the right read: “Overworked.” Underpaid. Disposable. Above the word “Overworked,” a hand had written “STILL” in blue marker, underlined twice.

I have spent years thinking about precarity in higher education. I have written about it as my doctoral committee at Royal Roads University helped me sharpen my argument. I have lived it as a contract academic at Thompson Rivers University for nearly two decades. I thought I understood the architecture. Standing in front of that door, I felt the weight of the word Still. That single adverb, written by hand, did more theoretical work than most of the literature I have cited.

Still, Dr. Euchner’s Door, Foundation Year Program, University of King’s College, Halifax

A door at King's College with two union posters reading First-Year Fellows Don't Make a Living Wage and STILL Overworked. Underpaid. Disposable.
Photo: Amy Tucker, © 2026

What the Door Said

The posters were produced by the University of King’s College Teaching Association (UKCTA), the union representing Faculty Fellows and Senior Fellows in the Foundation Year Program. Faculty Fellows are appointed to three-year non-renewable contracts. Senior Fellows are appointed to two-year non-renewable contracts. According to a position posting for the role, the starting salary for a Faculty Fellow in the Humanities was $52,343 to $56,627 as of July 1, 2022, with future scales tied to bargaining (University of King’s College, 2026). The duties listed include four to eight hours of tutorials per week, eight hours of lecture attendance, weekly office hours, bi-weekly essay grading, and an average reading load of sixty pages per day, four days per week.

Set this beside the most recent calculation from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) Nova Scotia office. Saulnier and Williams (2024) calculated the 2024 living wage for Halifax at $28.30 per hour, the highest rate in Atlantic Canada. The CCPA methodology assumes a household with two adults, each working thirty-five hours per week to support two children, which translates into roughly $51,506 in annual earnings per adult before taxes. The arithmetic is uncomfortable. A first-year Faculty Fellow at the 2022 salary floor of $52,343, working a load that almost certainly exceeds thirty-five hours per week once preparation, marking, reading, and committee work are honestly counted, is hovering at the line. The poster is correct. When the actual hours are accounted for, the line is behind them.

A tentative agreement was reached and ratified in early April 2026, after conciliation talks broke down and a strike appeared imminent (Chiasson, 2026; Taylor, 2026). The strike was averted. The structural questions on that door remain.

The Word That Did the Work

The word “Still” was what stopped me. The literature on contingent and contract academic labour returns again and again to the same pattern: a campaign, a report, a brief moment of public attention, and then quiet. The poster on the right side of Dr. Euchner’s door was familiar; this poster had been up before. The handwritten Still in blue marker suggested that the same poster, or one very much like it, had been put up before. The fight had been waged. The conditions had shifted too little for the poster to come down.

Time itself becomes a feature of precarity. In my dissertation at Royal Roads, Through Our Eyes: A Photovoice Study of Interconnected Precarity, Belonging, and Possibility in Higher Education, I argue that contract faculty and international students are bound together by parallel vulnerabilities. I call this interconnected precarity. The institutional logic that recruits international students for tuition revenue and discards them at graduation is the same logic that hires Faculty Fellows for teaching capacity and discards them at the end of the contract. The pattern is rhythmic. The bodies rotate through. The titles remain. The students change, the Fellows change, and yet the work and the conditions of the work persist. Still.

The Titles and the Trap

I have been developing a concept in a separate manuscript, recently advanced to conditional acceptance at Group and Organization Management, that I call malperformative inclusion. It names a particular institutional move: an organization performs the gestures of inclusion through titles, ceremonies, publicity, and acknowledgement programs, while the underlying structures continue to exclude. The performance is included only in the form. It is inclusion that performs the function of exclusion under another name (Tucker, in press).

The title “Faculty Fellow” is prestigious. It carries the resonance of Oxford and Cambridge collegiate traditions, of community, of belonging. It signals scholarly seriousness. It tells parents, applicants, and donors that the people teaching the foundational program are valued members of an intellectual community. The reality, laid out in plain language on paper taped to a door, is that the Fellowship is a non-renewable contract, that the salary in the first year falls at or below the regional living wage, and that the position will end on a fixed date with no path to continuation. The title performs inclusion. The contract performs disposability. This is what I mean by malperformative inclusion. The door named it more economically than my chapter does.

A Door Is a Photograph Is a Method

I look at this door, and I see a photovoice frame. Photovoice is a participatory research methodology developed by Wang and Burris (1997) in which participants use photographs to document conditions of life that conventional reporting cannot reach. The image becomes a means of testimony. It carries information that paragraphs cannot, because the image asserts: this is here, this is now, this is real.

The Faculty Fellows had no need for a researcher to come and document their conditions. They produced their own photovoice frame. They printed the words. They taped them to a door at the height of an adult reader. They wrote Still by hand. The hand-lettered word is the methodological signature. It says: a person did this. A person stood in this hallway and amended the original poster because, despite its accuracy, it was no longer accurate enough. Conditions remained unchanged. The poster required updating. Still.

The Faculty Fellows at King’s are doing the same work with paper and tape. The door is the camera. The corridor is the gallery. The asterisk citing Living Wage Canada is the methodological footnote. I find this beautiful and devastating in equal measure.

What I Take With Me

I take three things from this door into my own work and into my dissertation defence in the coming weeks.

The first is that precarity is rarely solved by a single agreement. The strike was averted at King’s College. I am genuinely glad. I also know from my work with the Federation of Post-Secondary Educators of British Columbia (FPSE) and my role as Chair of the Non-Regular Faculty Committee that aversion is a pause, and that resolution requires more. Three-year and two-year non-renewable contracts will continue to shape the working lives of those who teach in the foundational humanities program at one of Canada’s oldest universities. The poster must be taken down by the institution; the workers alone cannot remove it.

The second is that scholarly personal narrative is appropriate and, at times, necessary in such moments. I write in this voice because the door is in the first person. The hand that wrote Still is a worker’s hand, personal and deliberate, distinct from any institution’s. Theory should answer in kind.

The third is that the Foundation Year Program’s foundation rests on the labour of people paid at or below the living wage in the city where they live. The undergraduate students who arrive for their first year of university, often on student loans and family sacrifice, are taught by scholars whose own household economies are governed by precarity. Interconnected precarity is concrete, immediate, and present. It is the floor and the ceiling of the same building.

I left the corridor. I carried a photograph of a door. I carry it still.

References

Chiasson, N. (2026, April 8). Strike looming for some staff at Kings College in Halifax. Country 103.5 / Acadia Broadcasting. https://hotcountry1035.ca/2026/04/08/strike-set-for-some-staff-at-kings-college-in-halifax/

Saulnier, C., & Williams, R. (2024). 2024 living wages for Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Nova Scotia. https://www.policyalternatives.ca

Taylor, E. (2026, April 9). Strike avoided at University of King’s College after deal reached. Country 103.5 / Acadia Broadcasting. https://hotcountry1035.ca/2026/04/09/strike-avoided-at-university-of-kings-college-after-deal-reached/

Tucker, A. (in press). Malperformative inclusion as institutional practice [Commentary]. Group and Organization Management.

Tucker, A. (in progress). Through our eyes: A photovoice study of interconnected precarity, belonging, and possibility in higher education [Doctoral dissertation, Royal Roads University].

University of King’s College. (2026). Faculty fellowship in the humanities [Position posting]. https://ukings.ca/campus-community/employment/faculty-fellowship/

University of King’s College Teaching Association. (2026, April 9). Statement on tentative agreement. UKCTA.

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

I Was Always Good Enough. I Just Never Belonged.

Reading Time: 5 minutesThat is the hardest kind of knowing.

Not the not-knowing, not the wondering, not the long nights asking yourself if maybe they were right, maybe there was something missing, maybe if you tried harder, became more, gave everything one more time.

That kind of not-knowing is painful, but it has somewhere to go. It has a project. It has another application, another credential, another bar to reach for.

But this knowing.

This quiet, cellular, unshakeable knowing that you were good enough, that you were always good enough, that good enough was never actually the question,

this has nowhere to go.

It just sits with you. It sits with you at the table and watches you eat. It sits with you in the classroom where you are brilliant, where you are exactly, precisely, quietly brilliant, and no one is taking notes on what that costs you to keep offering.

It sits with you, and it says,

you already know.

Belonging is a different thing from being good enough.

I had to learn that the hard way, the way you learn things that the body has to teach because the mind keeps finding reasons not to believe them.

I kept thinking that if I reached the standard, belonging would follow.

That competence was a key. That excellence was a door.

I did not understand that some doors are not locked from the outside.

They are simply not doors for you.

Not because of what you lack. Because of what you are.

Because belonging is not earned. It is either extended or it is withheld, and the withholding can be so gracious, so warm, so full of genuine appreciation for everything you contribute,

that it takes you years to name it.

I belonged in the classrooms.

That I know. That I have always known.

I belonged in the moment a student’s face changed, the moment the confusion lifted and something settled in them, some new way of seeing that they would carry forward into a life I would never see.

I belonged in that. I was made for that.

That belonging was real, and no one can take it from me, not the committees, not the careful language, not the national searches that somehow always ended somewhere other than me.

But belonging in the institution, belonging in the structure, belonging in the place where your name is permanent, where your labour is protected, where you are not renewed or not renewed like a magazine subscription,

that belonging was never offered.

And I spent nineteen years trying to make myself into someone it would be offered to,

without ever understanding that the offer was never about me.

It was about them. It was always about them. What they needed. What made them comfortable? What fit the picture, they had already decided to hang on the wall.

I was good enough. I was more than good enough. I was exceptional in the ways that actually matter, in the ways that change people, in the ways that send students back years later to say I have been thinking about what you said.

I just did not fit the frame.

And here is the grief of that.

The grief that has no clean edges.

The grief that is not about failure because there was no failure, the grief that is not about inadequacy because there was no inadequacy, the grief that lives in the gap between being good and being claimed,

between being valued and being wanted,

between being used and being belonged to.

I was always the one who gave everything.

I was rarely the one they built anything around.

That distinction is a quiet devastation.

It does not announce itself. It accumulates. It is the slow sediment of years of being appreciated but not anchored, celebrated but not secured, needed but not chosen.

They needed me. They just did not choose me.

And I kept hoping that need would become choice, that usefulness would become love, that one morning I would walk in and the room would feel different, would feel like mine, would feel like somewhere my full self was not only welcome but waited for.

It never felt like that.

Not once in nineteen years did it feel like that.

And I kept showing up anyway, because the students were real, because the work was real, because my love for the classroom was real and sturdy and mine, and I was not willing to let the institution’s failure become my abandonment of them.

So I stayed.

And I carried the not-belonging the way you carry something heavy for so long that you forget you are carrying it, forget that your back hurts, forget that you set it down once for a whole summer and felt what it was like to stand up straight.

I carried it into every meeting. Into every application. In every performance review, they told me I was wonderful and gave me nothing I deserved.

I carried it home. I carried it into my rest, which was not really rest, but the place where the weight became more visible without the distraction of the work.

But I want to say something about the knowing.

The painful knowing, the always knowing, the knowing that never let me off the hook of my own truth.

It is also a gift.

I know that is hard to hear. I know it does not make the grief smaller, the injustice cleaner, or the nineteen years feel properly accounted for.

But the knowing means I never disappeared.

I never fully believed the story they were quietly telling about me, the story that said not quite, not enough, not right.

Something in me always knew better.

Some deep, stubborn, luminous part of me held the actual record, the real account of what happened in those classrooms, what I gave, who I was, how carefully and lovingly I did the work they were not even fully watching.

I kept my own record.

And my record says I was extraordinary.

My record says I belonged to the students even when the institution would not claim me.

My record says I walked into rooms that were not designed for me and I made them briefly, beautifully, mine.

I did not belong there.

I have said it now. I have let it be true without making it mean something is wrong with me.

I did not belong there.

And somewhere, there is a place that is already shaped like the person I actually am, a room with no raised bar, no moving target, no warm smile over a closing door.

A room that will look at the lantern and say

oh, we have been waiting for that light.

I have to believe that room exists.

I have to believe it the way I believe in the students who came back, the way I believe in the work that mattered, the way I believe in my own goodness on the days the grief is loudest.

I was always good enough.

I just never belonged there.

And that is their loss, written in nineteen years of what they almost had,

and my life, written in every student who walked out, changed.

Aquí estoy. Siempre fui suficiente. Simplemente nunca fue mi lugar.

Here I am. I was always enough. It simply was never my place.


Translation Note: Spanish phrases in this poem were assisted by Google Translate (translate.google.com). The Spanish is woven in as an act of reclamation, a return to a language of the body and the self that exists beyond institutional English.

Interconnected Precarity as an Ecology

Reading Time: 6 minutesReading Time: 6 minutes

Reading Time: 10 minutes

This piece belongs to A Human Geography of the Self, a series that reads my own life through the concepts geographers use to understand how people and places make one another. It draws on my doctoral and master’s work on contract academic labour, and on the original concepts I have developed through that research.

“No creature in the tidepool is precarious alone. Neither, I have come to believe, are we.”

In Loreto, at the lowest tides, the Sea of Cortez pulls back and leaves a world exposed in the rock. I spent many mornings crouched over those tidepools, watching. A hermit crab depends on a shell another creature has left behind. A small fish shelters in the shade of an anemone that could also sting it. Every life in that basin is held by other lives, fed by them, endangered by them, impossible without them. Pull one thread and the whole pool shifts. No creature in the tidepool is precarious alone. Neither, I have come to believe, are we.

I have spent nineteen years inside the precarity of contract academic work, and for most of those years I understood my insecurity as a private misfortune, a personal weather system I had to survive on my own. The tidepool taught me otherwise, and so did human geography. Insecurity, it turns out, behaves like an ecology. It is relational, distributed across linked lives, and profoundly uneven. In my own scholarship I have come to call this interconnected precarity (the idea that no person’s insecurity stands alone, that our vulnerabilities are bound together in a web, the way the lives in a tidepool are bound). This post is about that web, about who it holds and who it sacrifices, and about why seeing precarity as an ecology changes everything.

Precariousness Is the Water We Live In

The philosopher Judith Butler gave this its deepest grounding. As Grenier, Lloyd, and Phillipson (2017) discuss, Butler argues that our lives have always been defined by precariousness, a state founded on an interdependent web of social support and obligation, so that to live at all is to live socially, with one’s life always in some sense held in the hands of others (Grenier et al., 2017). Butler’s (2004) insight is that exposure is the human condition rather than a personal failure. We are sustained by the very same networks of care, work, and belonging that can also leave us exposed. There is no sealed, self-sufficient self. There is only the tidepool.

Grenier and colleagues (2017) take this somewhere that matters to me. They draw attention to a precariousness that is inherently shared, yet unequally experienced, so that while insecurity is part of every human life, certain lives are far more susceptible to its hazards than others (Grenier et al., 2017). They argue that the honest response is one grounded in an acknowledgement of the fragility and limitation that affect all human lives, and in inclusive forms of belonging built upon that shared condition (Grenier et al., 2017). This is the first turn of the ecological view. Once I understood my own precarity as part of a shared human interdependence rather than a personal flaw, the shame began to lift, and something more useful took its place, which was a sense of common cause.

The Web Is Uneven

If precariousness is shared, precarity itself is distributed with brutal unevenness, and geographers have mapped exactly how. Burridge and Gill (2017), studying asylum seekers cut off from legal aid across an uneven British landscape, draw on Butler to insist on what they call differential exposure (the way some populations are far more exposed to harm than others through political and spatial arrangements rather than through chance). They show that precarity is spatially uneven, that where a person stands, their legal status, and their access to resources all shape how exposed they are, and they caution that the concept of precarity becomes hollow the moment it flattens or erases these differences (Burridge & Gill, 2017). An ecology has niches, and some niches are far more dangerous than others. The tidepool is no democracy.

Then comes the insight that reorganized my whole understanding, and it came from a geographer writing about property. Blomley (2020) argues that precariousness is socially distributed in a very particular way: the security of the privileged to hold land and shelter is produced through, and actually depends upon, the production of precarity for others (Blomley, 2020). He calls this precarious property and shows that the comfortable image of the private castle, the sealed home that protects its owner from all dependency, is an illusion, because all security in land remains relational and revocable, and one person’s stable ground is built on another’s lack of it (Blomley, 2020). As a settler scholar, Blomley (2020) turns this lens on himself, acknowledging that his own access to land rests on the dispossession of Indigenous peoples, so that his security and their precarity are the same arrangement seen from two sides (Blomley, 2020).

This is the second concept I have developed in my own work, which I call asymmetrical precarity (the recognition that the web of insecurity is tilted, that some are made secure precisely by the insecurity of others). The tenured position and the contract position are not merely neighbours in an ecosystem. They are linked. The flexibility, the cost savings, and the security of the institution are produced through the disposability of people like me. My precarity was never simply my bad luck. It was someone else’s stability, viewed from underneath.

The Time Tax and the Cost of Staying Afloat

Living in an asymmetrical ecology extracts something from those who occupy its exposed niches, a cost that rarely appears on any ledger. I have come to name one form of it the time tax (the unpaid hours the precarious must spend simply staying afloat, reapplying, reproving their worth, managing an insecurity that the secure never have to think about). The hermit crab spends energy the anemone does not, merely to keep its borrowed shell. Across nineteen years I have paid this tax in evenings, in weekends, in the constant low hum of having to earn my place again and again. Burridge and Gill (2017) describe precisely this drain in the lives they study, the exhausting work of countering one’s own precarious position within a system arranged to keep one uncertain (Burridge & Gill, 2017). The time tax is how an asymmetrical ecology quietly transfers life from the exposed to the secure.

Interdependence as the Ground of Repair

Here is where the ecological view turns from diagnosis toward hope, and it is the reason I hold to it. If precarity is relational, then so is its repair. Sangaramoorthy (2018), studying how immigrants and care providers improvise mutual aid across a threadbare rural landscape, shows that precarity, even as it wounds, also generates circuits of social connection, belonging, and care (Sangaramoorthy, 2018). The very dependence on others that exposure forces upon us becomes, in her account, a profound recognition of our responsibility to one another, and the care that people offer each other inside precarity becomes a political act that opens the possibility of a livable life (Sangaramoorthy, 2018).

This is the deepest lesson of the tidepool. Interdependence is the wound and interdependence is the medicine. The same web that distributes insecurity unevenly is also the only thing strong enough to redistribute security. Grenier and colleagues (2017) call for exactly this, a response rooted in our shared fragility and in obligations of care that the secure owe the exposed (Grenier et al., 2017). My union work, my advocacy for non-regular faculty, my refusal to treat my precarity as a private problem, all of it grows from this single recognition: that we are an ecology, and an ecology survives through its relationships or fails through them.

What the Tidepool Knows

So I have stopped describing my insecurity as personal weather. It is an ecology, interconnected and asymmetrical, in which some are kept afloat by the sinking of others. Naming it that way is not merely an academic exercise. It is the difference between blaming myself and organizing with others. It is the difference between shame and solidarity.

I think often of those mornings crouched over the warm rock in Loreto, watching the held and holding lives in the basin. Every creature there was precarious, and every creature there was also someone else’s shelter, food, or threat. The pool survived because it was a web, and it suffered when the web was torn. We are the same. My precarity is bound to yours, and yours to mine, across the whole tilted ecology of our working and dwelling lives. The work of justice is the work of mending the web so that no one is made secure by another’s drowning. No creature in the tidepool is precarious alone. That is the wound, and it is also, if we choose it, the way out.


References

Blomley, N. (2020). Precarious territory: Property law, housing, and the socio-spatial order. Antipode, 52(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12578

Burridge, A., & Gill, N. (2017). Conveyor-belt justice: Precarity, access to justice, and uneven geographies of legal aid in UK asylum appeals. Antipode, 49(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12258

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.

Grenier, A., Lloyd, L., & Phillipson, C. (2017). Precarity in late life: Rethinking dementia as a “frailed” old age. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), 318-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12476

Sangaramoorthy, T. (2018). “Putting Band-Aids on things that need stitches”: Immigration and the landscape of care in rural America. American Anthropologist, 120(3), 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13054


🔍 Verified References
The citations in this post have been verified against CrossRef DOI records. View the verified reference list with notes for this post.

I Am Still Here

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Twenty-five years of the conditional tense. Contract. Sessional. Limited term. Contingent. Words that never quite fit what it actually was, which was showing up every September, as I belonged there. Because I did.

The neoliberal academy has a way of making you feel like a guest in your own house. No nameplate. No permanence. Just the work, and the work, and the work. Metrics where meaning used to be. Outcomes where wonder was.

And yet the students came. And yet the ideas grew. And yet something held.


She asked if I wanted to make a speech.

I smiled, looked down, and shyly said no.

Because what would I have said that the twenty-five years had not already said for me.


President Arini stood beside me, beautiful and kind, the way some people just are, like they were made to make others feel that what they did mattered.

And standing there in that hall at Thompson Rivers, in my red dress, holding something small and teal, I felt it.

That it mattered. That I mattered. Not as a line in a budget. Not as a temporary measure. As a person. As a teacher. As someone who stayed.


The gift came on a black cord. Copper, round and warm, figures etched into it the way the Secwépemc etched truth into stone long before any institution decided what counted as knowledge.

A tall figure, arms open. A small one beside. Together on the land.

I will wear it against my chest where all of it lives, the hard years and the good ones, the classrooms, the students, the quiet stubbornness of continuing.


They did not make it easy. They did not make it secure. They did not always make it fair.

But here is what I know, standing in that light, beside that woman who looked at me like I was worth celebrating:

I am still here.

Not in spite of it. Through it.

Still here. Still teaching. Still myself.

Amy Tucker. Still here.

You Got the Job

Reading Time: < 1 minuteThe email arrived on a Tuesday.

Subject line:
I got the job.
I wanted you to know.

I have a folder of these.
Not a large folder.
The kind of folder that is large enough.

You got the job.
You finished the degree.
You started the company.
You got into the program.
You named something after what you learned in my class,
which is a sentence I did not know was possible
until you sent it.

I want to tell you what those emails did.

They arrived in the ordinary middle of things,
between the grading and the planning,
between one contract and the hope of another,
in the years when the institution
was busy deciding my value
by metrics that had nothing to do with you.

And they landed like proof.

Not proof I needed from you.
You do not owe me the evidence of your success.
But proof that arrived anyway,
the way some things arrive,
without being asked,
without being required,
just because you wanted me to know
and you remembered
and you took the time to write.

I took the time to answer every one.

The institution will not find those emails
in any report.
They will not appear
in any metric of teaching effectiveness.
They are not countable
in the way the institution counts things.

I am counting them.

I have been counting them for twenty-five years.
That is the only number
that has never felt insufficient.

Para los que volvieron a contarme. Los cuento entre mis mejores cosas.
For the ones who came back to tell me. I count them among my best things.

Who Teaches the Distance Learners

Reading Time: < 1 minuteI want to ask you something.

When you imagine a professor,
what do you see?

The office with the books.
The name on the door.
The CV that fills a page with permanence,
publication stacked on publication,
tenure arrived at,
the slow accretion of institutional belonging.

Now imagine the person
who teaches the ones who cannot come to campus.

The single mother in a town four hours away.
The man finishing his degree at fifty-three
because life finally has a sliver of room for it.
The student with a disability
that makes the physical campus
a place of negotiation rather than welcome.
The worker on shift who studies in the break room.

Someone teaches them.

Someone builds the course,
writes the welcome,
answers the email at ten at night,
reads the submission carefully,
writes the feedback that says:
I see what you are trying to do here.
Let me help you do it.

Someone does that work.

She has a short contract.
She has no office.
She works from wherever the work can happen.
She is reviewed annually.
She is grateful for the renewal.
She does not complain,
or she complains only in the places
where complaining cannot change the weather.

She has been doing this for twenty-five years.

She is not unusual.
She is the norm.

She is how distance education runs.
She is the infrastructure
no one puts on the letterhead.

I am asking you to see her.

La que enseña desde los márgenes merece estar en el centro de la historia.
The one who teaches from the margins deserves to be at the centre of the story.

Twenty-Five

Reading Time: < 1 minuteLet me tell you what twenty-five is.

Twenty-five is the number of times
I signed a document that expired.

Twenty-five is the number of Septembers
I prepared a new cohort
for a course I was not sure
I would still be teaching in January.

Twenty-five is the number of times
I updated a syllabus,
redesigned an assignment,
read the new research,
learned the new framework,
showed up current and ready
for a position that was not prepared
to show up permanently for me.

Twenty-five.

People say: that is a long time.
They mean it as a compliment.
They mean: you must really love the work.

I do.
That is not the point.

The point is that twenty-five years
is long enough to have built something.
Long enough to have tenure.
Long enough to have a pension accumulating,
a name in the institutional memory,
a seat at the table where the decisions
about the courses you built
are being made.

I built something.
For twenty-five years I built something.

The institution holds it now
under someone else’s name
or no name
or the name of a process
that does not remember
whose hands made it.

Twenty-five.

They gave me a certificate.
They gave me a pin.

I gave them twenty-five years.

I am not doing the math out of anger.
I am doing it so the record is accurate.
So that anyone who reads this
understands what twenty-five years
of contingent labour looks like
from the inside of it.

It looks like this.
It always looked like this.

Veinticinco años. Que conste en el registro.
Twenty-five years. Let it be on the record.

They Called It Flexibility

Reading Time: < 1 minuteThey told me it was a benefit.

The flexibility.
The freedom to work from anywhere,
which meant the freedom to work from everywhere,
which meant the kitchen, the car,
the holiday that was not really a holiday
because the grades were due January second
and January second does not care
where you are.

They told me I was lucky.

I understood what they meant.
They meant: you should be grateful
we let you in at all.
They meant: a permanent contract
requires a different kind of person.
They meant: the flexibility is generous
when you consider the alternative.

I considered the alternative.
Every year I considered it.
The alternative had no map and I had children
and the work was work I wanted
so I called the flexibility a gift
and I was not entirely wrong
and I was not entirely honest.

Flexibility is a word that means something different
depending on which side of the contract you are on.

On my side it meant: be available.
On their side it meant: we are not responsible.

I learned the difference
the way you learn most important things,
late, and at some cost,
and in a way that cannot be unlearned.

I am not flexible anymore.
Or rather: I bend toward what is mine now.
Only that.
Only what is mine.

La flexibilidad era mía. El costo también.
The flexibility was mine. So was the cost.

What I Did With the Uncertainty

Reading Time: < 1 minuteI worked.

That is the honest answer.
I filled the uncertainty with work
the way you fill a crack in a wall
to keep the cold out,
the way you stay busy
so the waiting has less room
to become the only thing in the room.

I built new courses.
I revised the old ones.
I researched things no one asked me to research
because the research gave me somewhere to put the energy
that had nowhere else to go.

I sat on committees.
I answered emails I was not required to answer.
I attended the things that were optional
and made them less optional by attending,
which is a way of being useful
that is also a way of being visible,
which is a way of making yourself
harder to remove.

I understand now what I was doing.

I was making myself indispensable
as a substitute for making myself secure.
Those are not the same thing.
I learned that the slow way.

Indispensable means they keep using you.
Secure means you have rights.
I confused them for a long time
because the confusion was useful to the institution
and I did not yet understand
whose interests I was serving.

I understand now.

I am still a person who works.
That has not changed.
But now I work because the work is good,
not because the work is armor.

The distinction is everything.

Trabajé para llenar el vacío. Ahora trabajo para llenar el presente.
I worked to fill the emptiness. Now I work to fill the present.