Trauma scholar Bessel van der Kolk articulates that trauma represents far more than a discrete event from the past; it is an enduring imprint on mind, brain, and body that continues shaping how we navigate the present (2014, p. 21).

Keywords: childhood hypervigilance, trauma, nervous system, body memory, fear, safety, body-based experience, scholarly personal narrative, vignette

States of Being Rather Than Events

Content Warning: This vignette contains discussion of childhood exposure to parental alcoholism and domestic violence. While free of graphic detail, the material addresses trauma, fear, and hypervigilance that some readers may find distressing.

There are childhood memories constructed from discrete events, moments with clear beginnings and endings. And then there are memories that exist as states of being rather than as events, atmospheric conditions that pervaded entire years. This vignette attempts to capture one such state: the pervasive fear that characterized my childhood from approximately ages three through twelve, the years when my father’s alcoholism and violence made our home a place of constant threat. This is the texture of hypervigilance itself rather than the memory of a single incident, the embodied experience of a nervous system locked in perpetual defensive mobilization.

Psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk (2014) has demonstrated that trauma represents far more than a discrete past event; it is an enduring imprint on mind, brain, and body that continues shaping how we survive in the present. For children living in homes characterized by unpredictable violence, the imprint forms through chronic activation rather than through isolated traumatic events of threat-response systems.

Neuroscientist Stephen Porges (2011), developer of the polyvagal theory, explained that the autonomic nervous system continuously evaluates environmental cues for safety or danger through a process he termed the body’s instinct to scan for safety, an unconscious detection of threat that occurs beneath conscious awareness. In homes where violence erupts unpredictably, children’s nervous systems become calibrated to constant danger, their bodies’ instinct to scan for safety tuned to detect the subtlest indicators of impending harm.

I return to this material now because I cannot understand what thirty days by the sea gave me without understanding what had been taken first. The capacity for alonetude, I have come to believe, requires a nervous system that was once allowed to learn that stillness is safe. Mine learned something else entirely. What I am doing in Loreto is less a discovery than a reclamation.

The Architecture of Chronic Threat

What I am attempting to document here defies conventional narrative structure. There is no rising action, no climax, no resolution. There is only the ongoing state of estar alerta, being alert, a way of inhabiting the world that became so normalized I forgot there was any other way to be. The challenge in writing about this lies in conveying the atmospheric quality of constant vigilance, the way fear became the background hum against which all other experiences played out.

Robert Nash (2004) calls this Scholarly Personal Narrative: the practice of using one’s own experience as scholarly data, rigorously examined and theoretically grounded. My childhood hypervigilance is far more than personal history; it is a case study in how developing nervous systems adapt to chronic threat, how children organize their entire beings around the imperative of survival, and how early experiences of danger foreclose later capacities for rest and solitude.

Psychiatrist Judith Herman observes that children living in chronically threatening environments organize their entire existence around preventing further harm, shaping every aspect of their development and behaviour (1992).

Complex Trauma and Deformation of Personality

Before the narrative, the science. Because what I carried in my body has a name. Psychiatrist Judith Herman (1992) introduced the concept of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (complex PTSD) to describe prolonged, repeated trauma occurring in contexts where escape is impossible, particularly during developmental years. Herman distinguished complex PTSD from single-incident trauma, noting that repeated trauma in adult life erodes the structure of an already-formed personality, but repeated trauma in childhood fundamentally shapes and deforms the personality as it develops. Children exposed to ongoing domestic violence develop far more than memories of specific frightening events; they develop an altered baseline state characterized by constant vigilance, disrupted attachment, and a compromised sense of safety.

This distinction matters profoundly. Single-incident trauma, while devastating, occurs against a backdrop of relative safety. The person knows what normal felt like before the trauma and can potentially return to that baseline. But for children in chronically threatening environments, a safe baseline is absent. The threat is the baseline. Safety, when it occurs, feels like an aberration.

How the nervous system responds to safety and threat, and the Hierarchy of Survival Responses

How the Nervous System Responds to Safety and Threat, developed by Stephen Porges (2011), provides a crucial understanding of how chronic threat shapes the nervous system. Porges described three hierarchically organized subsystems of the autonomic nervous system: the genuine safety system, which supports social engagement and feelings of safety; the sympathetic nervous system, which mobilizes fight-or-flight responses; and the dorsal vagal system, which produces freeze, collapse, and shutdown responses. In safe environments, the nervous system flexibly moves between these states as situations require. However, in chronically threatening environments, the system becomes biased toward defensive states, with the genuine safety social engagement system chronically inhibited (Porges, 2011).

For children in violent homes, this means the nervous system rarely experiences the regulation that comes from safe, attuned relationships. Instead, as van der Kolk (2014) documented, traumatized individuals carry fundamentally different bodily experiences than those who have felt safe and welcome in the world. The chronic activation of threat-detection systems creates what trauma researcher Janina Fisher (2017) termed structural dissociation, the fragmentation of the personality into parts that carry different survival strategies. Children develop what Fisher described as trauma-related action systems, including fight, flight, freeze, submit, and attach-cry-for-help responses, each associated with specific bodily states and relational patterns.

Hypervigilance as an Adaptive Strategy

Hypervigilance, which van der Kolk (2014) characterized as the persistent expectation of danger that keeps the body in a state of high alert, becomes a chronic state rather than an acute response. Clinical psychologist Christine Courtois (2008) noted that children in abusive homes develop what she termed anticipatory anxiety, constantly scanning environments and monitoring adult moods to predict and potentially avoid danger. This anticipatory stance, while adaptive in the moment, creates lasting alterations in how the nervous system processes safety cues even in genuinely safe environments.

Hypervigilance is best understood as an intelligent adaptation rather than a pathology. The child who learns to read micro-expressions, to detect shifts in vocal tone, to map escape routes through the house, that child is surviving rather than malfunctioning. The problem arises from the persistence of the adaptation long after the threat has ended, in the way the nervous system continues to signal danger even in contexts of genuine safety.

Betrayal Trauma and the Violation of Reality

The specific experience of being falsely accused connects to what trauma researchers call betrayal trauma, a concept articulated by psychologist Jennifer Freyd and summarized in Freyd (2008). Freyd argued that when those who should protect us instead harm us, or when we are blamed for harm done to us, the violation cuts deeper than the harm itself because it undermines our basic capacity to trust our own perceptions. For children, false accusations by abusive parents create a double bind: the child knows they were innocent of the accused act, yet the parents’ power requires submission to the false narrative, creating a fundamental rupture in the child’s sense of reality and worth.

Freyd (2008) distinguished betrayal trauma from other forms of trauma by emphasizing that it occurs when the people or institutions on which a person depends for survival violate that trust. For a child, there is no one more dependent upon for survival than parents. When parents both harm and deny the child’s reality, they commit what might be understood as epistemic violence, an assault on the child’s capacity to know what they know.

Parentification and the Burden of Protection

Finally, the pattern of attempting to protect younger siblings represents what family therapist Salvador Minuchin (1974) termed parentification, a developmental distortion in which children assume caretaking roles beyond their capacity. Jurkovic (1997) further described how parentification places the child in an impossible position, simultaneously serving as both a caretaker and a dependent. The child becomes hypervigilant for their own safety as well as their siblings’, exponentially increasing the burden on their developing nervous system.

Most relevant for the current inquiry into alonetude, parentified children often struggle with solitude because their nervous systems learned early that constant vigilance is required for self-protection as well as for the protection of others. Rest feels like a dereliction of duty. Solitude feels like abandonment of the post.

van der Kolk (2014) demonstrates that the body continues to register and respond to danger signals even when conscious memory holds no record of the original trauma.

The Vignette: The Feeling in My Stomach

The Constant Companion

I am seven. Or eight. Or nine. The specific age matters less than the constancy: from my earliest memories until approximately age twelve, I lived inside a particular sensation. It sits in my stomach, a tight ball of readiness. Neither quite nausea, though sometimes it tips that way, nor quite pain, though it aches. It is the feeling of waiting. Esperando (waiting). Always listening and waiting for the sound that will tell me whether this evening will be safe.

The sound is the garage door. My father’s car is pulling in at the end of the day. My body knows before my mind processes: the particular rhythm of his footsteps tells me everything I need to know. Heavy, deliberate steps mean danger. Lighter, quicker steps might mean safety, though guarantees are absent. The ball in my stomach tightens, and my breathing changes without my choosing. I am listening with my whole body, with every sense.

By the time I hear the garage door, I have already assessed multiple variables. What day of the week is it? Fridays are more dangerous. How late is he? Later means more drinking. Did my mother seem tense at dinner? Her tension means she has already sensed something. Is my younger sister being too loud? Noise draws attention, and attention is dangerous. The youngest is seven years younger than me, still small enough that sometimes she cries in ways I cannot quiet, and this terrifies me more than my own danger.

Reading Atmospheres

I develop a hyperawareness of atmospheres. I can feel the charge in the air before anything visible changes. My mother’s shoulders tighten in a particular way. The house itself seems to hold its breath. By age eight or nine, I had learned to read micro-expressions, shifts in vocal tone, and the precise degree of door-closing force that indicates anger. I am fluent in the language of approaching violence in ways that children should never need to be fluent.

The worst moments arrive before violence, during the hours of waiting, the ball in my stomach wound so tight I think it might tear something open. During these hours of waiting, I strategize. Where are my sisters? If something happens, can I get to them? Are there obstacles between me and their rooms? I map the house in my mind like a battlefield, planning routes and refuges. The hall closet has been my hiding place before. The space under my younger sister’s bed. The corner behind the living room chair, where I can pull my knees to my chest and make myself small. Pequeña. Invisible. (Small. Invisible.)

The Geography of Hiding

The house has its own geography of fear. Certain rooms are more dangerous than others. The kitchen, where my father drinks after work, where the counter holds the evidence of how many bottles have been opened. The living room, where he sits in his chair and calls us to him. The hallway between my room and my sisters’ rooms, which I must cross to reach them if they need me, feels impossibly long and exposed.

I learn to move through the house silently. I learn which floorboards creak, which doors squeak, and how to open cabinets without sound. I learn to make myself unnoticeable, to exist without creating disturbance, to breathe so shallowly that even my breath draws no attention. This skill, this ability to minimize my presence, will follow me for decades, will manifest in adult relationships as difficulty taking up space, as apologizing for existing, as constantly making myself smaller to accommodate others’ needs.

But in childhood, this skill kept me alive. Or at least, it keeps me safer than I would otherwise be. Which is something entirely different from safe. Genuine safety was absent there. There are only degrees of threat, gradations of danger that I learn to navigate with the precision of a cartographer mapping treacherous terrain.

The Sound of My Name

Sometimes my father calls my name. This sound, my own name spoken in his voice when he has been drinking, produces a physical response I have no control over. My heart accelerates. My vision narrows. The ball in my stomach clenches. I freeze, completely still, as if stillness might make me invisible. But I must answer. Silence is worse. I force my legs to move, force my voice to work, force my face into neutrality. The walk down the hallway to wherever he is calling from feels like walking to execution. Caminar hacia el miedo (walking toward fear).

“Did you do this?” His voice, accusing.

The meaning of “this” remains unclear. A glass was left on the counter. A door left ajar. A light was left on. The television is too loud. The offence varies and often makes no logical sense. But the pattern is always the same: I am accused of actions I never committed, actions I would avoid because I am so careful, so hypervigilant about avoiding any reason for attention, for anger, for danger.

“No,” I say, my voice small. This is true. I was innocent of whatever he accuses me of. But truth carries no power here.

Freyd (2008) explains that betrayal trauma occurs when those we depend upon for survival violate our trust, creating wounds that extend beyond the traumatic event itself to undermine our capacity to trust our own reality (Freyd, 2008).

The Fracturing of Reality

The moment stretches. He decides whether to believe me. Sometimes he does. Sometimes he refuses to. When he refuses to believe me, when he insists I am lying even though I am telling the truth, something breaks inside me each time. Beyond the fear of punishment, though that fear is real, something deeper: the understanding that reality itself can be overwritten by someone else’s version, that my knowing what is true offers no protection, that I can be blamed for actions I never committed simply because someone with power over me decides I am guilty.

This lesson embeds itself deeply. Decades later, I will struggle to trust my own judgment, will defer excessively to others’ interpretations of events, will doubt my own memory and experience even when I have clear evidence of their accuracy.

The Leaving

During these moments, I split. Some part of me goes away to a place where his words cannot reach. My face remains neutral. My body stands still. But I am elsewhere entirely. Years later, I will learn this is called dissociation, a survival strategy my nervous system deployed to protect me from unbearable psychological pain. In the moment, I only know that I must conceal my tears, restrain my defence, and hide how afraid I am. Any emotional response increases danger.

Where do I go when I leave? The answer eludes me. It is an automatic response rather than a conscious choice, my body’s wisdom protecting me in the only way available when fight-or-flight is both impossible and dangerous. I exist in some internal space that feels grey and distant, muffled, as if I am underwater and the sounds are reaching me from far away. This internal refuge keeps me functioning, but at a cost: I lose pieces of my experience, cannot fully remember what happened during these dissociated moments, and carry gaps in my memory that will later make me doubt whether events occurred as I recall them.

The Weight of Protection

After these confrontations, after he has yelled or grabbed or made his point through whatever means he chooses, I go to check on my sisters. My younger sister, only one year younger than me, has often heard everything through the walls. I find her frozen in her bed, eyes wide, her own body locked in the same alert state that grips mine. “It is okay,” I tell her, though we both know the reality is far from okay. “He is calmer now.” Ya pasó. (It has passed.) Though we both know the calm is temporary, that it will come again, that this is merely an intermission.

I smooth her hair the way our mother does, or used to do before exhaustion made all gestures mechanical. I try to absorb her fear into my own body, try to create a buffer between her and the violence, try to convince both of us that I can keep her safe when in reality I am just another child, just as powerless, just as frightened.

The youngest, still small, often sleeps through these episodes. When she wakes, confused by the atmosphere, by the tension that lingers in the house like smoke, I make up reasons. “Dad was just talking loud about work.” Anything to preserve her innocence a little longer, though I suspect she absorbs the fear even when its source lies beyond her conscious awareness. Babies know. Children know. Bodies know what minds try to deny.

The Vigil

I lie awake long after the house has gone silent. The ball in my stomach slowly, slowly begins to unclench, though it never fully releases. My body remains ready, vigilant. Sleep comes late and lightly. I will wake at any unfamiliar sound, my heart already racing before I am fully conscious. Tomorrow I will move through school in a fog of exhaustion, but I have become skilled at hiding this, too. At appearing normal. At performing the role of a child who is fine when everything inside me is wound tight as a wire.

The Normalization of Terror

This is hundreds of memories rather than a single memory; thousands of moments of fear spread across years. This is the texture of my childhood, the baseline state against which any moments of safety appear as aberrations. The ball in my stomach becomes so constant that I forget there was ever a time I existed without it. It becomes my normal, the lens through which I perceive the entire world: dangerous, unpredictable, requiring constant vigilance.

Even in moments that should be safe, the fear persists. At school, I scan constantly for social threats, for signs that peers might reject or exclude me. During rare family outings when my father is sober, I remain tense, waiting for the mood to shift. The nervous system, once calibrated to a constant state of threat, cannot easily recalibrate, even when external circumstances temporarily improve. Safety feels temporary, fragile, a gift that can be revoked at any moment.

What I lacked understanding of then but comprehend now through trauma neuroscience is that my body is accurately responding to chronic threat by remaining in a state of mobilized defence. The hypervigilance is entirely rational, a genuine response to genuine danger. The problem emerges later, when the danger has ended, but the defensive mobilization persists, when my adult nervous system continues responding as if I am still that child in that house, still needing to monitor constantly for threats that no longer exist.

Analytical Reflection: How Chronic Fear Shapes the Developing Self

The Colonization of the Body by Trauma

The experiences documented above illustrate what van der Kolk (2014) described as the colonization of children’s bodies by trauma, the way threat becomes inscribed in their nervous systems at the most fundamental level (van der Kolk, 2014). There are several things happening at once here. The constant monitoring of environmental cues for safety represents Porges’s (2011) concept of the faulty body’s instinct to scan for safety, in which the nervous system becomes so calibrated to threat detection that it perceives danger even in neutral or safe situations (Porges, 2011). For children in chronically dangerous environments, however, the body’s instinct to scan for safety is accurately attuned to real threat rather than to a truly faulty one. The problem emerges later, when the nervous system maintains this threat-detection bias long after the environment has changed.

The ball in my stomach described in the vignette represents what trauma therapist Peter Levine (2010) identified as chronic sympathetic nervous system activation combined with freeze response. Levine (2010) explained that when fight or flight responses are impossible, as they often are for children in abusive homes, the nervous system enters a state he termed frozen flight, in which mobilization energy remains trapped in the body, creating sensations of constriction, tightness, and readiness that never discharge (Levine, 2010). This trapped activation, maintained over years, creates lasting alterations in how the body experiences and responds to stress.

Disorganized Attachment and the Impossible Bind

Second, the hypervigilant monitoring of my father’s moods and movements exemplifies what attachment researcher Mary Main (1991) termed disorganized attachment, the attachment pattern that develops when caregivers are simultaneously sources of comfort and fear. Main (1991) noted that children with disorganized attachment display contradictory behaviours, alternately approaching and withdrawing from caregivers, because their attachment and defence systems are simultaneously activated. The child needs the parent for survival, but also needs to protect themselves from the parent, creating an irresolvable paradox that fragments their sense of self and safety.

Adults with histories of disorganized attachment often experience relationships as simultaneously compelling and dangerous. They crave intimacy while fearing engulfment. They seek closeness while maintaining defensive distance. The nervous system never learns to distinguish between connections that nourish and those that harm, because in childhood, they came from the same source.

Epistemic Violence and the Undermining of Reality

Third, the experience of false accusation illuminates what Freyd (2008) termed institutional betrayal, extended here to familial betrayal. When authority figures who should protect us instead harm us and then blame us for the harm, they violate both our physical safety and our cognitive integrity. The child knows themselves innocent of the accused act, yet the parent’s insistence creates what psychologist Albert Biderman (1957) identified in his study of prisoners of war as forced compliance with false narratives, a form of psychological torture that undermines the victim’s grip on reality itself.

Freyd (2008) argued that betrayal trauma is particularly damaging because it involves violations by those on whom we depend for survival. For a child, parental accusations of wrongdoing against an innocent child create a double trauma: the initial experience of being blamed, and the deeper violation of having their reality denied. Over time, this pattern erodes the child’s capacity to trust their own perceptions, creating what trauma therapist Alice Miller (1981) described as a dynamic in which children learn to doubt their own experiences and instead adopt the abuser’s version of reality as a protective strategy.

Parentification and the Foreclosure of Childhood

Fourth, my role as protector of my younger sisters represents destructive parentification. Jurkovic (1997) distinguished between instrumental parentification, taking on practical household tasks, and emotional parentification, providing emotional support and regulation to family members. My hypervigilance extended beyond self-protection to constant monitoring of my sisters’ safety, effectively requiring me to function as parent, protector, and threat-assessor simultaneously. Jurkovic (1997) documented how this impossible burden reshapes identity in ways that persist long into adulthood.

The long-term consequences of parentification include difficulty accepting care from others in adulthood, a persistent sense of responsibility for others’ emotional states, and a compromised capacity to recognize and communicate one’s own needs (Hooper, 2007). Most relevantly for the current inquiry into alonetude, parentified children often struggle with solitude because their nervous systems learned early that constant vigilance is required for survival. True rest, true solitude, true letting go of protective vigilance can feel dangerous even decades after the original threat has ended.

Dissociation as Survival and Its Lasting Costs

Fifth, the dissociative response I described, the sense of going away during unbearable moments, represents what van der Kolk (2014) termed the last resort of the organism when fight, flight, and freeze are all impossible (van der Kolk, 2014). Trauma researcher Ellert Nijenhuis (2004) explained structural dissociation as the division of the personality into parts: an apparently normal part that attempts to function in daily life, and emotional parts that remain stuck in traumatic states. For children in chronically abusive environments, dissociation serves a crucial protective function, allowing them to continue functioning while parts of themselves remain frozen in moments of overwhelming threat.

However, as psychiatrist Frank Putnam (1997) documented, chronic childhood dissociation creates lasting alterations in consciousness, memory, and the sense of self. The capacity to leave one’s body during threat, while adaptive in the moment, can become an automatic response triggered by even minor stressors in adulthood. This creates a fragmented relationship to embodiment, making it difficult to remain fully present in one’s body even when genuinely safe.

Table 1

Neurobiological and Psychological Impacts of Chronic Childhood Fear

Note. This table synthesizes neurobiological and developmental impacts of chronic childhood exposure to domestic violence. The mechanisms and legacies interact in complex ways; separating them into discrete categories oversimplifies their interconnected nature.

Critical Interrogation: Limitations, Risks, and Ethical Considerations

Academic integrity requires examining what this vignette might distort or what ethical concerns it raises. First, writing about childhood trauma risks what trauma studies scholar Roger Luckhurst (2008) called wound culture, the commodification of suffering for narrative purposes. By making my childhood fear into scholarly material, I risk flattening its complexity, turning lived anguish into theoretical illustration. Luckhurst (2008) cautioned against trauma narratives that serve primarily to elicit sympathy rather than advance understanding.

However, feminist scholar Wendy Brown (1995) argued that the strategic deployment of injury narratives can serve political and epistemic purposes when done critically. Brown (1995) distinguished between wounded attachments, identities organized entirely around injury, and critical injury discourse, which examines structures of power that produce suffering. My intention here aligns with the latter: using personal experience to illuminate how chronic childhood threat shapes lifelong patterns of embodiment, relationship, and capacity for rest.

Second, this vignette focuses on my experience as the oldest sibling and temporary protector, potentially obscuring my sisters’ distinct experiences. They lived in the same house but occupied different positions in the family system, different ages and therefore different developmental impacts, different strategies and different injuries. My narrative must resist the temptation to presume to speak for them or to represent the definitive truth of our shared childhood. Philosopher Linda Alcoff (1991) cautioned about the problem of speaking for others, noting that even well-intentioned representation can silence those whose experiences differ from the narrator’s.

Third, by focusing on my father’s alcoholism and violence, this vignette might appear to pathologize addiction or to reduce complex family dynamics to simple perpetrator/victim categories. Addiction medicine recognizes alcoholism as a disease requiring treatment rather than moral failure. My father’s violence and my fear are both real, and neither negates the other’s reality. Trauma-informed practice requires holding multiple truths simultaneously: that my father likely experienced his own traumas, that addiction reflects neurobiological changes in the nervous system thrown off balance, and that none of this erases the harm caused or reduces my right to name my experience honestly.

Fourth, the emphasis on hypervigilance as a survival strategy risks romanticizing trauma’s adaptations. While it is true that children develop remarkable capacities for threat detection and self-protection, these deserve recognition as costly adaptations rather than gifts that trauma provides. What psychologist Mary Sykes Wylie (2004) called the myth of resilience obscures the profound costs of surviving chronic trauma. I did survive, but at an enormous developmental, neurobiological, and relational cost. The hypervigilance that kept me alive also kept me from experiencing a protected childhood, from developing secure attachment, and from knowing my body as a safe space.

Finally, memory’s limitations apply here as powerfully as in any autobiographical narrative. The experiences I describe occurred decades ago, filtered through a child’s understanding and shaped by adult sense-making processes. As Schacter (2001) documented, memory is inherently reconstructive rather than reproductive. I cannot know with certainty which details are accurate recall and which are narrative elaboration. What I can attest to with confidence is the affective truth, the emotional and body-based resonance of these memories, the way my body still responds to certain triggers in ways that suggest deep encoding of threat.

My stomach still clenches in ways. My breath still catches when I hear certain vocal tones. My shoulders still rise toward my ears when doors close with force. These body-based responses suggest that, whatever the precise accuracy of my narrative recollection, something real was encoded, something that continues to live in my nervous system.

Porges (2011) demonstrates that when a nervous system has been shaped by chronic danger, safety itself can feel foreign and unfamiliar, requiring conscious relearning of what secure states feel like.

Where I Land: From Hypervigilance to Alonetude

The Legacy of Chronic Threat

This vignette matters to the larger Alonetude project because it illuminates why solitude, rest, and the very idea of letting down my guard feel so dangerous, even five decades after the original threat ended. Trauma researcher Pat Ogden (2006) explained that traumatized individuals often experience solitude as threatening rather than restorative because their nervous systems learned that constant vigilance is required for survival. The capacity to be alone, truly alone without hypervigilance, requires what Porges (2011) termed safety signals, environmental and relational cues that allow the genuine safety system to inhibit defensive mobilization.

The thirty days in Loreto represent an attempt to provide my nervous system with sustained safety signals: predictable routine, the absence of threat, permission to rest, and solitude chosen rather than imposed. This is about healing rather than getting over childhood trauma or transcending its effects through willpower. Rather, as van der Kolk (2014) argued, healing from trauma requires finding a way to become calm and focused while remaining in connection with one’s body and emotions. The retreat offers conditions for what trauma therapist Janina Fisher (2017) described as healing the fragmented self, the gradual integration of dissociated parts through experiences of sustained safety.

Retraining the Nervous System

The ball in my stomach, that childhood sensation of perpetual readiness, still activates under stress. My nervous system still scans the environment for threats more vigilantly than necessary. I still experience difficulty with unstructured time, with true rest, with letting my guard down. These are accurate indicators of deep fear encoding rather than failures of character, signs of how profoundly threat became inscribed in my body during formative years. Understanding this through trauma neuroscience helps me recognize that my struggles with solitude reflect nervous system adaptations to real threat rather than characterological weakness to real threat.

What the Loreto retreat offers is gradual, patient retraining rather than erasure of these patterns. Porges (2011) explained that the nervous system can learn new responses through sustained exposure to genuine safety combined with therapeutic relationships. While I am alone physically in Loreto, I carry with me the relational safety of chosen connections, including therapeutic relationships that have helped me begin to recognize safety cues. Each morning when I wake without the ball in my stomach, each hour I spend in my body without dissociating, each moment of genuine rest represents a small victory in retraining a nervous system calibrated long ago for perpetual threat.

Honouring the Child Who Survived

The child who learned to make herself small, to anticipate danger, to protect her sisters at cost to her own development, that child still lives in my nervous system. Todavía está aquí. (She is still here.) This retreat offers her, at last, what she needed then and never received: sustained safety, permission to rest, and recognition that the hypervigilance that kept her alive is no longer required. This is alonetude’s deepest promise: solitude as sacred space rather than isolation in which I can finally, slowly, begin to put down vigilance’s exhausting burden.

In moments of particular stillness here in Loreto, I sometimes feel her presence, that vigilant child-self. She is always scanning, always alert, always ready. “You can rest now,” I tell her, speaking internally in the way therapy has taught me. “Puedes descansar.” You can rest. The fight is over. The danger has passed. You kept us alive, and now you can rest.

She struggles to believe me. Decades of hypervigilance dissolve slowly, and thirty days by the sea brings only beginnings. But sometimes, in the early morning light when the pelicans glide past my window, when the only sound is the gentle pulse of waves against shore, I feel her soften slightly. The ball in the stomach unclenches, just a degree. The breath deepens, just a fraction. The shoulders drop away from the ears, just momentarily.

These are quiet healing moments rather than dramatic ones. They are quiet, incremental, and easily missed. But they matter. They represent the slow work of teaching a nervous system calibrated to danger that safety is possible, that rest is permitted, that solitude can be restorative rather than threatening. This is the work of alonetude: integrating rather than transcending the past, honouring rather than erasing the hypervigilant child, but finally giving her what she always needed and deserved.

The Ongoing Nature of Healing

Healing from complex childhood trauma follows a winding course, achieved through ongoing effort rather than once and maintained. It requires ongoing, patient attention to the body’s responses, compassionate curiosity about triggers and patterns, and a willingness to remain present even when every instinct says to flee, freeze, or fight. It requires what van der Kolk (2014) called befriending the body, learning to listen to its signals as information rather than threat.

The thirty days in Loreto are practice rather than a cure. Practice staying present. Practice in recognizing safety. Practice in allowing rest. Practice in trusting that perpetual vigilance is no longer required for survival. The hypervigilant patterns will persist for some time. But perhaps, with sustained attention and compassionate patience, they can soften. Perhaps the nervous system can learn, slowly, that safety is genuinely possible, genuinely sustainable rather than merely temporary.

This is what brings me here, to this casita by the sea, to these thirty days of chosen solitude. Engagement with the past rather than escape from it. Acknowledgment of trauma’s impacts rather than denial. Honouring her intelligence, her survival, her fierce protection of those she loved, while gently teaching her that the time for such fierce protection has passed, that she can finally rest, that she is safe now, que está segura ahora (that she is safe now), that alonetude offers refuge rather than threat, possibility rather than danger, peace at long last.

References

Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221

Biderman, A. D. (1957). Communist attempts to elicit false confessions from Air Force prisoners of war. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 33(9), 616–625.

Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press.

Courtois, C. A. (2008). Complex trauma, complex reactions: Assessment and treatment. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, S(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/1942-9681.S.1.86

Fisher, J. (2017). Healing the fragmented selves of trauma survivors: Overcoming internal self-alienation. Routledge.

Freyd, J. J. (2008). Betrayal trauma. In G. Reyes, J. D. Elhai, & J. D. Ford (Eds.), The encyclopedia of psychological trauma (pp. 76–77). John Wiley & Sons.

Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence: From domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.

Hooper, L. M. (2007). The application of attachment theory and family systems theory to the phenomena of parentification. The Family Journal, 15(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480707301290

Jurkovic, G. J. (1997). Lost childhoods: The plight of the parentified child. Brunner/Mazel.

Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.

Luckhurst, R. (2008). The trauma question. Routledge.

Main, M. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) models of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127–159). Routledge.

Miller, A. (1981). The drama of the gifted child: The search for the true self. Basic Books.

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Harvard University Press.

Nash, R. (2004). Liberating scholarly writing: The power of personal narrative. Teachers College Press.

Nijenhuis, E. R. S. (2004). Somatoform dissociation: Phenomena, measurement, and theoretical issues. W. W. Norton & Company.

Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the body: A sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy. W. W. Norton & Company.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and finding our own calm. W. W. Norton & Company.

Putnam, F. W. (1997). Dissociation in children and adolescents: A developmental perspective. Guilford Press.

Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton Mifflin.

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

Wylie, M. S. (2004). The limits of talk: Bessel van der Kolk wants to transform the treatment of trauma. Psychotherapy Networker, 28(1), 30–41.

Translation note. Spanish language passages were generated using Google Translate and subsequently reviewed and refined by the author. Any remaining infelicities reflect the limits of machine translation rather than intent.